<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denver Democrats Sick With Hope and Altitude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nyulocal.com/submitted-opinion/2008/09/03/denver-democrats-sick-with-hope-and-altitude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nyulocal.com/submitted-opinion/2008/09/03/denver-democrats-sick-with-hope-and-altitude/</link>
	<description>The Blog of New York University</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Roy</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/submitted-opinion/2008/09/03/denver-democrats-sick-with-hope-and-altitude/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=302#comment-55</guid>
		<description>@ Chris: Because the New Hampshire delegation was originally pledged to Clinton, and Emily told me they would either be sticking with her or voting for Obama, and they hadn't decided yet. I understand the disappointment that Clinton didn't nab the nom, but it seems like unnecessarily deepening a party split to continue to throw support behind someone who, according to her speech that night, doesn't even want that support anymore.

I mean, everyone is allowed to vote for who they want to. That's the beauty of democracy! I just don't understand what the party or the country gains by continuing to support someone who lost the nom and is encouraging you to put your votes towards her opponent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chris: Because the New Hampshire delegation was originally pledged to Clinton, and Emily told me they would either be sticking with her or voting for Obama, and they hadn&#8217;t decided yet. I understand the disappointment that Clinton didn&#8217;t nab the nom, but it seems like unnecessarily deepening a party split to continue to throw support behind someone who, according to her speech that night, doesn&#8217;t even want that support anymore.</p>
<p>I mean, everyone is allowed to vote for who they want to. That&#8217;s the beauty of democracy! I just don&#8217;t understand what the party or the country gains by continuing to support someone who lost the nom and is encouraging you to put your votes towards her opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/submitted-opinion/2008/09/03/denver-democrats-sick-with-hope-and-altitude/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=302#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Why does their potential decision not to support Obama make them blind supporters of Hillary?  Maybe they will decide to just not vote, or vote for a 3rd party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does their potential decision not to support Obama make them blind supporters of Hillary?  Maybe they will decide to just not vote, or vote for a 3rd party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
