Opinion, Submitted Opinion - by Josh Becker on Friday, September 12, 2008 12:20 - 8 Comments
Is the Concept of Popular Music Dead?
Originally posted at Jess and Josh Talk About Stuff
If the Video Music Awards proved anything, it’s that, well, MTV has lost its touch. But more than that, it showed that the level of music we call “popular” has broadened its scope over the past couple of years, which actually works to contradict the idea of said music’s “popular” status in the first place. Let me explain.
Maybe I’ve just gotten a little too old to be on top of, say, Z100’s current playlist, but I remember back in the 90s and early 00s, I knew every song nominated for a VMA. (Okay, there were always those one or two obscure videos, but I think they were nominated because the videos themselves were cool, not because the songs were necessarily underground smashes.) They were the biggest hits of the year, playing on radio constantly, having their videos be requested around the clock on The Box (sigh, I miss that channel), and just generally pervading the culture.
But this year’s VMAs featured such nominees as Ne-Yo, Danity Kane, and Taylor Swift. None of which had huge hits this year, at least at the level that MTV’s flagship annual program would concern itself with. (No, “Damaged” was not a hit.) Sure, we also saw Katy Perry and Britney Spears, but…Katy rose to fame on the strength of her digital EP UR So Gay, and for all its buzz, Britney’s Blackout wasn’t the hit-producing chart-topper some hoped it would be. Which is exactly my point: I think the Internet has destroyed, or at least vastly changed, the concept of popular music.
It used to be that the hit songs were whatever radio and MTV wanted to play, and if you wanted to hear other music you really had to dig. Now, though, we have the Internet, and you can listen to Wolf Parade and Britney Spears with equal ease. iTunes, arguably the largest music store in the world, currently includes lists as its top-selling artists (in terms of Top Songs) T.I., The Pussycat Dolls, and M.I.A. Sure, “Paper Planes” was a breakout hit for the latter artist, but it’s remarkable that a song from a Sri Lankan indie darling can achieve equal popularity with with a song by the most popular currently-together girl group in America. I’m happy for M.I.A.; her music is wonderful, and it’s great that so many people are getting a chance to hear it. But without the Internet, I don’t know if her music would have achieved such popularity. In the days before Pitchfork, you had to go to scour music magazines and go to the record store in order to find artists who weren’t carried by Sam Goody; now, though, you can get any kind of music from the same service–iTunes–and new music is but a link away.
So while this increases the scope of popular music, it also limits its power, because once everything is popular, nothing is popular. Being a “top-selling artist” loses its meaning as people download illegally or burn music from friends; it’s more about buzz than record sales. So while The Shins can enter the public’s consciousness, perhaps Christna Aguilera and Lil’ Kim has begun to fade out of it, pushed away by a score of other female pop and hip-hop stars who have seen their careers rise (or re-rise; hi Robyn) due to viral success. The artists from the pre-Internet era who survive today have done so for two reasons: either they have just become such a powerful cultural force that their name has guaranteed a fixed position for them in music culture–Britney, Madonna, etc.–or else they have successfully used the Internet to promote their music–Lil’ Wayne has released a bevvy of online mixtapes, for instance, and Radiohead’s Internet sale of In Rainbows revolutionized the record sales industry. But popular radio, like Z100 of the Tri-State Area, has lost its meaning; in a world where anyone can download whatever music they want at any time, nobody wants to hear whatever music an overpaid radio DJ has been given a bonus to promote. And YouTube has brought back the music video! As much as we’d all like to see MTV play more videos, hasn’t YouTube kind of rendered that network’s function obsolete? We don’t need to wait for John Norris to introduce the new Kanye West video; we can watch it online instead, right now, for free. (Okay, one link–go watch it here. SO CUTE.)
Is “popular” music now whatever gets the most downloads on iTunes? Whatever the blogs hype the most? Whatever music gets the most word-of-mouth buzz? That’s a difficult question, but I can tell you what popular music is not, at least by default: the music playing on Top 40 radio and nominated for a VMA. Actually, let me revise that statement: just because a song is played on Top 40 radio or nominated for a VMA, does not mean it is popular in today’s culture. Am I just out of touch, or is it a little weird that Linkin Park won “Best Rock Video”? Because, honestly, who actually listens to Linkin Park anymore? Maybe I’m just too entrenched in New York, but I don’t see how fans voted Linkin Park to victory, as nobody I know–in college or back home in Jersey–claims to like them, and I haven’t even seen them played on MTV Hits (when…when I watch that network.)
And I didn’t see M.I.A. get a single nomination.
Photo by Flickr user radiospike photography used under a Creative Commons license.
8 Comments
Jordan W.
Linkin Park actually had one of the best selling rock records of last year. Who woulda thunk it…
Cody Brown
Ned, I am usually with you but saying Josh, saying the concept of popular music is dead is about as solid as saying the concept of celebrity is dead.
It is true that it is now possible to be a personal media God and easier than ever to niche and listen to nothing but Bulgarian Folk Music. The problem is that you need to consider that the MP3 is only a fraction of what it means to be a popular musician or band. There will always be a desire to see who is behind a great piece of music. If there wasn’t, why is so much money spent on making music videos? It is impossible to be a popular musician without becoming a cultural icon and if we share a geographic space with one another there will always be a desire to have a set of icons we can talk about. (usually about how much we hate them)
I think a lot of the reason why you don’t know much about the bands who won VMA’s but you did before is because you are no longer in middle school.
Shit, sorry again Josh. I don’t know why I keep doing that only with your columns. Anyway, fixed.
@Cody: Not actually my post. I really need to stop doing that.
i think that this might just be your response to mia blowing up. just because you heard it first via in-the-know nyu students, doesn’t mean it’s not “popular music” now that it’s expanded outside of that niche.
Cody–That’s a good point. I’m NOT in middle school, my knowledge of music has expanded (albeit only slightly), so maybe I’m not as familiar with the music that’s targeted toward that age group. Still, I feel like there are fewer musical icons to talk about now than there were, say, 10 years ago, just because the source of “popular music” has expanded from a fixed group of media–MTV and the like–to the vast reservoir of music knowledge that is the Internet. I’m not being critical in my article, so much as observant of a general cultural shift. But I don’t know, maybe I”m just too much inside my own musical bubble.
Mike–That really wasn’t my point at all. Thank you for using this as an opportunity to snidely insult my taste though. You’re awesome.
Pinter Noss
Wow, what a completely illegitimate argument. You have no idea how the music industry works whatsoever. Music that is in Top 40 is popular. That is a fact. While the method for people to access music has drastically changed (yes, you TOTALLY hit the nail on the head that the internet is making it easier for people to listen to what they want, I never would have guessed!), Billboard has taken that into consideration in compiling their charts. Why do you think T.I.’s “Whatever You Like” jumped from 78 to 1 two weeks ago? BASED ON THE STRENGTH OF DIGITAL DOWNLOADS.
And it’s clear that you’re just another jaded college kid that thinks drinking Sparks and listening to Fleet Foxes is what everyone in America is doing. No matter how many Of Montreal CDs you jerk off to (and think you’re one of the many, many listeners doing it), Britney is popular in the mainstream world - “Blackout,” for example, sold just shy of a million copies. Christina Aguilera, contrary to your claim that she’s “fading out of public consciousness,” went double platinum on her last CD. And I love Robyn just as much as the next asshole New York music snob, but her record sold 7,000 copies. So before you go on making claims that popular music isn’t really determined by top 40 popularity, you should do your homework instead of writing an essay full of holes.
Oh, and one final thing. Katy Perry got famous because “I Kissed a Girl,” her only major hit to date, was the lead single from her debut album “One of the Boys.” Her “UR So Gay” EP, which didn’t feature her only major single, was barely a speck on the mainstream radar. But I guess that doesn’t matter, since you’ve already proved so many other points. My bad.
“And it’s clear that you’re just another jaded college kid that thinks drinking Sparks and listening to Fleet Foxes is what everyone in America is doing.”
Yup. Totally right. And, like, taking Polaroid pictures of myself.




NED
You are a great writer; you don’t need to attribute yourself to my columns.
=D