picture-23

How a Fringe Group at NYU Went From Being Disliked to Loathed – The Story of the TBNYU! Kimmel Occupation

Featured, Featured Box, On Campus, TBNYU! Kimmel Occupation 2009 - by Surekha Ratnatunga on Friday, February 20, 2009 21:35 - 53 Comments

Amidst the swelling crowd at Kimmel’s cafeteria Wednesday night, NYU Local’s Charlie Eisenhood began what has now become a legendary lesson in liveblogging with the prophetic words:

Somebody just asked me if I needed a number for legal counsel if I get thrown in jail. Looks like this might be a bit more than a dance party.

DAY ONE

picture-23
Just before 10PM,TBNYU! barricaded the doors to the cafeteria and began reading out a list of demands, which included budget disclosure, making Bobst public and giving aid/scholarships to Gaza. Half an hour later, NYPD had a small presence outside Kimmel. According to Charlie’s coverage, TBNYU! members were open to negotiating with administrators from the start.

picture-23

Before protesters started taking naps around 3.30AM, the occupation seemed somewhat wholesome. Charlie got some great pictures of people dancing, painting posters and playing cards. One NYU Security guard was quoted as saying, “It’s not a barricade, we could tear that down anytime. Get something heavier.”

DAY TWO

Maybe protesters got grumpy from surviving off a slow stream of coffee. TBNYU! announced a rally and press conference slated for noon Thursday. Charlie counted 47 people in the cafeteria and not all of them were from NYU. TBNYU! began negotiations with Bob Butler, executive director of the Office of Student Affairs, at 10.30AM to gain access to the balcony for the press conference (and irritable smokers). The request was denied.

picture-23
Hungry crowds began gathering outside Kimmel around noon. No quesadillas, but maybe the bare breasts on view were of some comfort? Another 25 people shimmied past security to join in the fun. At 1.50PM TBNYU! upped the ante by breaking the deadbolt on the balcony door. Protesters promptly started hanging banners and screaming over a megaphone. Smokers took a glorious breath of tarred air. TBNYU! revised their “non-violence/no property destruction” statement. Thankfully for Charlie, food finally arrived at around 2.20PM (though sadly vegan).

Rumors that protesters may be expelled or arrested at the end of the occupation started circulating. At the 5PM conference, a TBNYUer proclaimed, “we will not stand for these scare tactics!” Oh, the irony. If scare tactics don’t work, why barricade yourself in a building?

At 9PM, the 33 remaining protesters were joined by 55 more, who through a herculean effort overcame… a doorstop. A security guard was injured in the hoopla.

After midnight NYPD presence was immense; squad cars and police vans lined the streets along Kimmel and Bobst. Anarchists and quesadilla-lovers voiced differing opinions on TBNYU!’s occupation. Eager photographers (guilty) were anticipating arrests at 1AM, which was when Kimmel officially closed.

Just before 2AM TBNYU! members were granted permission to stay the night at Kimmel, but they would not be granted amnesty. This is when, after blogging for 30 hours straight, Charlie went home to get some well deserved sleep. The only person who ended up in a squad car was of Alex Deschamps, a Steinhardt Senior, who decided to mount a No Parking sign outside Kimmel.

DAY THREE

Kimmel did not open Friday morning, and at noon Charlie found out that administrators and security guards raided the 3rd floor and Kimmel was peacefully cleared of all but four protesters, who insisted on loitering on the balcony till removed.

NYU students who stuck around Kimmel till Friday morning were suspended and stripped of campus housing, while the University said anyone who did not identify themselves as an NYU student will be prosecuted for trespassing. No arrests, and no TBNYU! demands met.

Top Photo by Dean Stattmann

Share
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Google
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr


53 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Cody Brown
Feb 20, 2009 22:48

First.

:)

Svetlana Mooskio
Feb 20, 2009 23:38

2nd……

…………………..who cares.

Eric Levin
Feb 20, 2009 23:42

Unclear as to what happened to the non-NYU people? Are they being charged?

NYU Student
Feb 20, 2009 23:59

TBNYU and its protesters are all a disgrace to our university. They took an entirely wrong approach in making a list of stupid demands. Hopefully administration has the heart to expel them and get rid of them from NYU forever. I’m a middle class student that has many loans coming out from NYU and even I didn’t agree with anything they said.

They made a mistake calling themselves the voice of NYU students. TBNYU represent only a small fraction of the university. They had to bring students in from other universities to push their ideas, they could not even get full NYU support.

Farrah Khimji is an embarrassment and a disgrace to many of us students. Even in the end, she attempts to try to make NYU the evil giant. By the way, Barron was not their friend. Growing up in Brooklyn, I know he is someone who tries to make his positions known at random events. He was there solely for the press, not for the TBNYU protest.

If there is one success they had this week, it was to make known the presence of TBNYU. They made TBNYU a group to be loathed and hated amongst students.

May they all be expelled from NYU.

-NYU ‘12

Henry Chan
Feb 21, 2009 0:32

Suspended and kicked out of housing.

ACG
Feb 21, 2009 0:39

Good write-up, Surekha. Now I have something to link to for people that think I’m crazy, that no-one could possibly be as stupid as these kids :) .

Also do you know when Charlie’s publishing the planned expose of all the things he couldn’t say while he was inside?

Eric Levin
Feb 21, 2009 0:40

@Henry… right the NYU students are suspended, but how about the non-NYU students?

Eric Levin
Feb 21, 2009 0:40

BTW, TBNYU(!) has claimed victory on their website. Ha.

Matt Nolin
Feb 21, 2009 0:42

Nothing has happened to non-nyu students and I doubt anything will, unless their respective university takes action on them

Sara F
Feb 21, 2009 0:58

Regardless of your views on the actions of TBNYU, I think we all can agree that something needs to change about the way our university does business. The students have no say whatsoever in how our tuition money is spent. The student government can at best, make polite suggestions to the administration which the administration is not even required to consider. I am personally in a battle with NYU financial aid right now because they have taken away my federal work-study allotment and refuse to provide me with a reason for why they did this. This needs to change. So for all of you who don’t agree with this method of protest I ask you, un-sarcasticly (if that’s a word), what have you done to create change at NYU, and what are your plans for so doing so in the future? If you have better ideas I would strongly encourage you to implement them. I love NYU and I don’t to leave. Instead, I would like to see change.

Bob Watson
Feb 21, 2009 1:10

It’s “up the ante.” Jesus, I now realize what illiterate douchebags NYU students are, but don’t you kids play poker???

ACG
Feb 21, 2009 1:57

@Bob I don’t know what you’re referring to, but please don’t lump the entire university in with TBNYU.

Larkin Perez
Feb 21, 2009 2:07

I have one comment to say to the sympathizers about NYU publicizing what they do with your money…when they’re a private university

No. Just…no. I’d agree with you if they were public, but they’re not.

Do you try and find out what is done with your money spent on food? How about the money you spent on fuel, do you try to find out where that money goes? Unless you want to encompass everything about your circular logic, then leave it be. You payed for an education, and that’s what you’re getting.

George
Feb 21, 2009 3:10

“At 1.50PM TBNYU! upped the anti* by breaking the…”

*ante

(sorry)

NYU Alum
Feb 21, 2009 5:12

Hey Bob, where did you go to school?

michael
Feb 21, 2009 7:44

I wish the cops would have shot all those fucks. they are stuck up rich kids who wanna put it on their resume. GO TO FUCKING SCHOOL snotty cunts! have a great day. Jesus saves and Gretzsky gets the rebound and scores. Fuck you!

Retarded In Love » If you’re going to protest, do it right.
Feb 21, 2009 8:32

[...] Fortunately, I didn’t see anyone I knew in any of the pictures. I would’ve been embarrassed for them. Although, I think the police spraying mace at the crowds might have been a tad inappropriate as well. Read the whole story here. [...]

Nelly Yuki
Feb 21, 2009 9:39

What does suspension mean for a college student? Are they being forced to take the semester off?

Rob D
Feb 21, 2009 11:03

Fine May 68ers indeed! Vive la suck!

Mike M
Feb 21, 2009 11:45

Sara F: NYU is private they dont have to tell us anything about money. If we don’t like it we can choose not to attend and then our money will not be used by them since we arent paying them anything.

If you want to know where the money is going attend a public (state of city run) school.

Kevin DeYoe
Feb 21, 2009 12:00

I do not in any way support their actions, because I strongly disagree with the manner in which they were carried out. However, I find that a few of their demands, though worded in a rather threatening way, at their heart are progressive, tolerance-promoting ideas. And the one about not letting tuition increases exceed inflation? I’m really behind that one.

None of their demands were met largely because of the way they chose to argue them, in an isolating (both physically and mentally, as now they have a large group of students in arms against them) way. But one thing that they did do, which I can’t help but commend them for, is get everyone from the entire university talking about the same thing. They forced people to talk about their demands, bringing awareness of the changes they think should be met.

Most importantly, a letter was sent by the University Republicans and Democrats afterward disagreeing with most of what TBNYU did, but saying that they were genuinely concerned with some of the demands, and would like to start discussing them. Given the fact that these two groups are rather extremist here, the fact that they want to work together for this common goal I think is impressive.

So although no good has come from TBNYU’s actions (which it shouldn’t), some good might come from the aftermath, as other studentr groups work to make the good changes in a good way.

kevin cook
Feb 21, 2009 12:20

@Mike M, Your argument is Bullshit. As has everyone else who has arrived at the same conclusion.

Due to the incredible demand “choosing not to go to NYU” will have no effect on the school since there are about 6 kids who get rejected for every 4 that make it in. The only way to make any awareness of tyranny and allow for any change whatsover is to change it while already attending the university.

emily st
Feb 21, 2009 12:32

as someone involved with the occupation from start to finish, i appreciate this post–even if we went from being “disliked to loathed,” this particular timeline is overall accurate and downright decent. thanks.

Chris Brown
Feb 21, 2009 12:34

“Due to the incredible demand “choosing not to go to NYU” will have no effect on the school since there are about 6 kids who get rejected for every 4 that make it in.”

I think this says more about the lack of a real demand for NYU to change than it does to discredit Mike M’s point (or anyone else who has expressed it). Perhaps if TBNYU had done a better job of educating the public about their cause and the reasoning behind their demands, perhaps if TBNYU actively protested during admissions tours (which is a much better idea than this stupid stunt), there would be more people willing to join the cause. Perhaps there would be more students second-guessing their college choice.

NYU isn’t breaking any laws in their non-disclosure. It’s not tyranny, it’s their right to run their for-profit enterprise in this way. As long as there are enough students willing to ignore what TBNYU sees as unconscionable actions by the administration, TBNYU will make absolutely no traction, and NYU has absolutely no reason to change.

MZ
Feb 21, 2009 13:02

You kids should be AShamed of yourselves. Don’t you have any values or morals? Listen to yourselves. You swear and you resort to name calling. Your are ignorant !!! you need to be RESPECTFUL to those who are trying to help you succeed in life.Rich white kid? What is that.? Do you really listen to yourselves? I have a white kid and he is there paying his own way because I don’t have the money. YOU are the future of this country and think of the young child you are influencing. Change comes from within first. When you behave like adults then you will be taken more seriously. You have a mouth and a voice use it the right way. Please do not include JESUS or any other religious figure in with your filthy language and negativity. Think of how they would have handled themselves. Every kid should be as lucky as you to have a college education. Show us that you use your education. Yes you have a right to ask questions but do it in a manner that is worthy for an answer. Love Your, parents and caregivers

Michael Ronan
Feb 21, 2009 13:53

In one sense, I can admire their willingness to make a change in something they care about. With that said, I cannot condone their medthods and somewhat ridiculous demands. I mean, come on. Did they really think that they coud get NYU to make Bobst public (I still don’t get that one), rebuild the university at Gaza and get a bunch of Palistinians free rides. That is a serious overestimation of their power. It was a bit sad to see something that could have been in some way positive turn into a just a bunch of kids dancing (or more flailing their arms and legs around wildly) on a balcony while attempting to be taken seriously. I think one of the first rules to have your protest be taken seriously is not turn your protest into a dance party. They have a diffrent opinion.

Joe Blow
Feb 21, 2009 14:35

Pimpin’ aint easy, nuff said

Charlie Eisenhood
Feb 21, 2009 18:13

@ ACG: My follow-up piece will likely be published on Monday.

Harry Chen
Feb 21, 2009 18:51

I really thought NYU students were better then CUNY-SUNY students but after this. I really must retract that thought. I go to St John’s University and I am really glad I declined to go NYU because of its massive costs. I have been to NYU and I know where the money goes. If students don’t agree which NYU’s actions then the student body must gather up. Personally as a School I would not use it so much on looks I would spend it on education which I know the money disappears. For St John’s University it is considered a NON-profit org so it can have money disappear. I don’t know about NYU.

Sara F
Feb 21, 2009 20:09

I stil don’t understand the rationale of “If you don’t like it then leave.” If the government of the US were corrupt, most Americans would not leave. They would create a change because they love their country, but not necesarily their government. I don’t see any difference here. I love NYU: the faculty, students (most of them), the classes, etc. I don’t love the administration. I don’t like that President John Sexton gives himself raises which are (percentage of salary-wise) more then double what faculty members get. Even though our tuition increases every year because “it has to” according to Sexton, he still recieves very large pay increases. And I still don’t know where my work-study money went. These things are wrong and I want to see them change. I don’t want to see my school run like a corporation where the people at the top make a ton of money and do not have to answer to anyone. It doesn’t have to be that way. They could change it if they wanted to. The fact that they aren’t proves they have something to hide and they count on those who don’t like it to simply leave so that they can continue doing what they are doing. Maybe you don’t mind these things but I would like to see things get better for all our sakes.

ACG
Feb 22, 2009 1:30

@ Charlie – thanks, and great job again. What a triumph for new journalism and NYU Local.

Mickey B
Feb 22, 2009 1:44

@ Sara F:

You clearly don’t know how a corporation works because corporations have to be transparent. The executives of publicly traded companies must answer to the owners and to the government if they are not transparent with financial information. You may have heard of Enron and WorldCom; if not, look them up as they are relevant.

NYU is a private not-for-profit organization. They have no such legal obligations. Would it be nice? Absolutely. But you cannot make a comparison to a government, especially the United States which was founded “by the people for the people” because NYU is for the people but not by the people, and therefore do not have these particular obligations to the people.

Your argument that NYU’s lack of transparency shows they have something to hide is completely specious. That’s the kind of logic that abolishes any concept of privacy. Whether non-profit organizations, or perhaps just similar non-profits, should be entitled to this type of privacy is debatable. Personally, I think there’s a fair amount of merit to either side, but that’s something to bring up to your congressional representative.

If someone truly doesn’t like the university’s policies as much as TBNYU, why not just boycott the place? Take your money where you won’t have qualms spending it.

Alex Lotorto
Feb 23, 2009 7:08

Here’s a thought.

Cluster bombs, banned by countries in international treaties, subject to condemnation by Obama, as indiscriminate and comparably horrible as napalm during the Dow Chemical divestment movement in Vietnam…I don’t want to pay Textron, the company that makes them.

Unfortunately, Textron stock is largely owned by the State Street mutual fund. Also unfortunately, I am a student at one of the many colleges and universities that invest in State Street-Textron.

Thus, my tuition creates financial capital for the institution to use as it invests its money in cluster bombs.

Now let’s say I organize a coalition of 21 organizations representing thousands and thousands of students, like Take Back NYU! and include in its purpose, socially responsible investing, specifically for war and genocide profiteers.

Then I spend two years organizing with those groups through Student Senate and escalating and asking in all the right ways that our ethical objections be given some weight.

Do I, or do I not, have a right to demand that the institution hold itself accountable to the ethical concerns of its community? Students are members of the community too and our ethics should not be secretly discarded in Trustee board rooms, they should be represented by a Socially Responsible Investing/Finance Committee! An institutional fix to an institutional failure.

And on top of all that, the power relationships at universities SUCK. Why can’t we sit across the table from administration and be seen as equals? When can we ditch this hierarchy and have our opinions considered to the degree that it affects us?

Take Back NYU! isn’t asking for radical change, even though they are mostly radical students. They are biting their tongues and asking for fucking reforms because that’s what they see as achievable, accessible, and strategic. You should be happy that they aren’t uprising like Greek students did in December.

Disagree on the tactics all you want, but jeez, their demands are to resolve their deep ethical concerns of the University.

Odds are, most people posting here could give two shits about the social justice footprint of NYU…you should be thankful that someone is picking up your shit for you.

Eric Levin
Feb 23, 2009 13:07

@Alex: No, you do not have that right. Look up the definition of the term “private university”.

Raw Footage From the Last Moments of the Kimmel Occupation | NYU Local
Feb 24, 2009 5:14

[...] and see more about the protest here, and here. [...]

Wally Orlando
Feb 24, 2009 6:40

“Why can’t we sit across the table from administration and be seen as equals?”

Because you’re not.

Next question…?

John D. Andrews
Feb 24, 2009 9:10

Alex,
Your tuition is not supporting Textron. Quite the contrary, Textron is supporting you by producing products which yield shareholders a dividend, thereby growing your school’s endowment, and thereby holding down tuition and other expenses you might otherwise incur as a student. You may want to consider withdrawing from the school if you don’t like their investment practices. Perhaps you can organize others to do likewise. But you should not give up on getting an education. There’s much to be learned.
As for me, I think I’ll increase my holdings (yields are excellent at today’s price), then take a Cessna flight to warmer climate, rent an EZ-Go cart and play a few rounds on a Jacobsen-maintained golf course.
Best regards,
JDA

Kasper Hauser
Feb 24, 2009 14:04

In the immortal words of the great Jack Handey…

“Sometimes I think you have to march right in and demand your rights,even if you don’t know what your rights are, or who the person is you’re talking to. Then on the way out, slam the door.”

I don’t think a greater blow against “The Man” has occurred since Janet Jackson flashed her boobie during the Superbowl halftime show a few years ago!

A. Harris
Feb 24, 2009 15:08

I am an NYU alumnus and I am going to contact alumni relations and tell them that I will not donate another red cent to the University until every last one of the spoiled rotten IDIOTS involved with this is expelled from NYU. I am also going to contact other Alumni and ask them to do the same thing.

Estarcatus Ribaldinus
Feb 24, 2009 19:54

Actually, that a young person might feel passionate about something or other, this or that, is completely understandable. Also, that they would get swept up on the passion of those beliefs is also quite understandable, and excusable.

That said, what is not excusable is the stupidity on display here. There is a class of protestor, in this country and abroad, that understands their main mission to be to annoy as many people as possible, until their message is heard. Take a walk down the street of any city brave enough to host a G7 meeting, and you will see what I am talking about here. Invariably, you have the usual suspects show up at these things, wtih the black kerchiefs, the intolerable bullhorns (through which the typical inanities are shouted) and the crude paper-machier likenesses of world figures (tediously burned in effigy). There is dancing, singing and bad poetry. There is the anger, the pointless destruction of private property,.

Walk amongst these dolts, if you can stop breathing long enough so as to avoid the body odor, and ask a few questions. Go ahead, I dare you. Most of the people you speak to, you will soon realize, have only the vaguest notion of the issues against which they passionately rail, and have even less of a grasp on how to effect change in any meaningful way. What you will find is that, for at least 90% of those involved, the protest itself is nothing more than a party, with angry cops and burning cars. It is fairly disheartening, for instead of young idealists with visions of change, what you find is a strange mishmash of communists without a clue, nihlistic anarchists who believe in nothing and ordinary kids hoping to get lucky. And yet, here they are, shutting down a large portion of this or that downtown area.

Of course, what you also find are those ordinary folks on the fringes, watching all of this and wondering what all the fuss is about. And they will never really know because there is not a single message that may be articulately explained. There is radical agitprop, plenty of it. There is cheap thrill seeking. The result is that the kids involved are viewed as silly, and are loathed for their intellectual vacuity. Surely they feel themselves morally superior to the average Joe, just trying to get his nut. But, in actuality, they are light weights, easily marginalized for being annoying, moralizing light weights. And thus whatever cause has so inflamed them is also marginalized. Who wants to listen to a nitwit? Even if they are right, which is open for debate.

The Interesting News Thread - Page 57 - StrafeRight Forums
Feb 25, 2009 11:46

[...] Hippies at NYU causing controversy… How a Fringe Group at NYU Went From Being Disliked to Loathed – The Story of the TBNYU! Kimmel Occup… __________________ [...]

Where Dave Is » Blog Archive » 02/20 The Pretentiousness That Ate NYU: Part IV
Mar 2, 2009 19:30

[...] • NYU Local recaps the whole thing [...]

P Thompson
Mar 4, 2009 22:18

Wow. I thought NYU was a selective college. I guess you guys are letting in every douchebag who applies these days. Well, I guess you still own a lot of real estate. I think your police force needs to acquire some devices of force. Like shotguns or chemical weapons in case you get so many turds in one room again.

rick wilson
Mar 4, 2009 23:33

Hey Alex, you stupid, ignoramus. As others have tried to explain to you

-the owner of stock does not put any money into the company, unless they buy the stock when the company first issues shares. After that, as is the case with NYU’s indirect holding in Textron, payment for the shares goes to the prior owner of the shares, not the company. I’m sure the NYU B School students could explain this, if you could take your head out of your ass crack long enough to listen

-don’t like where your university invests, leave. did they tell you that in return for your tuition, you would get not only and education, but a say in how they invest their endowment. NO! you whiny puke, they did not. Take an extra buck from mommy and daddy and buy a clue!

John Casey
Mar 25, 2009 3:52

I always thought the Kent State tragedy in 1970 was horrible and I could never understand how the National Guard could have shot those kids. Now I know.

After seeing those whiny self-righteous TBNYU jerks up there on the balcony demanding that vegan catering be brought in, I wanted to shoot them myself.

If they want to do something for Gaza, maybe they should drop out of school and send Mummy and Daddy’s money over there for relief?

It’s amazing to me that these idiots weren’t expelled.

My only thought is that the administration is filled with misty-eyed ex-hippies who want to believe that there little creeps are re-birthing the sixties.

Current NYU Student
Mar 28, 2009 22:33

A. Harris,

I am with you. This is a complete embarrassment to the entire NYU community. I watched the video of the original students occupying Kimmel and recognized one of the students involved. She is currently not suspended. I have seen her attending classes and at other NYU events. I am sure it is her because I previously met her. Everyone involved, whether they left Kimmel or occupied it until the end should have to face the consequences.

Eric Peters
Apr 9, 2009 10:14

“Picking up our shit”? You didn’t accomplish a god damn thing,
so don’t go sucking your own dick over something you DIDN’T do.

Three NYU Students Arrested During New New School Occupation | NYU Local
Apr 12, 2009 23:59

[...] police roundup of student occupiers at the New School Friday. All were protesters during the TBNYU Kimmel Occupation in [...]

The Three NYU Students Arrested During New New School Occupation May Face Discipline Hearings | Politics News
Apr 13, 2009 11:02

[...] police roundup of student occupiers at the New School Friday. All were protesters during the TBNYU Kimmel Occupation in [...]

Willam Adler
Aug 27, 2009 18:19

“Cluster bombs, banned by countries in international treaties, subject to condemnation by Obama”

Is there anything useful or productive that Obama hasn’t condemned?

In point of fact, cluster bombs are more useful, less destructive, and more humane than single-ordnance bombs or MOABs. With a single-ordnance bomb the kill radius has a linear fall-off, meaning for greater kill radius you must massively increase the destruction at the epicenter. Cluster bombs disperse smaller packets of ordnance over a wider radius, requiring a smaller overall payload deliverance. They also do less damage to infrastructure.

The ‘ban cluster bombs’ campaign is outdated. The outrage over cluster bombs was that supposedly the bomblets could remain, undetected, and explode on some innocent person at a later date. But that was only true ages ago. New cluster bombs have killswitches that engage or disarm them after timeouts. This idiotic name-check campaign is almost as dumb as the ‘ban landmines’ idea. Try holding a position in enemy territory without landmines, then get back to me.

I’m not surprised that a bunch of hippies don’t understand military technology, any more than I will be surprised when I get the standard nutroot reply about ‘hugging a child with nuclear arms’ or similar nonsense. War exists, and believe me you want to survive it.

Bush’s Shoe-Wielding Protester Freed | NYU Local
Sep 16, 2009 9:31

[...] at NYU are no strangers to ostentatious forms of protest, but this one certainly generated more fanfare than your average act of rebellion. You might [...]

student protest is not what it used to be, and not in a good way, I think « antiracism criticism
Sep 22, 2009 21:20

[...] How a Fringe Group at NYU Went From Being Disliked to Loathed – The Story of the TBNYU! Kimmel… [...]

Pat Dollard | Young Americans | Blog Archive » NYU Student Protest Successful At Getting No Demands Met - With Videos
Oct 11, 2009 1:38

[...] NYU Local: [...]

Leave a Reply

Our Policy on Comments

Comment

The Demands

1.) Full legal and disciplinary amnesty for all parties involved in the occupation.

2.) Full compensation for all employees whose jobs were disrupted during the course of the occupation.

3.) Public release of NYU’s annual operating budget, including a full list of university expenditures, salaries for all employees compensated on a semester or annual basis, funds allocated for staff wages, contracts to non-university organizations for university construction and services, financial aid data for each college, and money allocated to each college, department, and administrative unit of the university. Furthermore, this should include a full disclosure of the amount and sources of the university’s funding.

4.) Disclosure of NYU’s endowment holdings, investment strategy, projected endowment growth, and persons, corporations and firms involved in the investment of the university’s endowment funds. Additionally, we demand an endowment oversight body of students, faculty and staff who exercise shareholder proxy voting power for the university’s investments.

5.) That the NYU Administration agrees to resume negotiations with GSOC/UAW Local 2110 – the union for NYU graduate assistants, teaching assistants, and research assistants. That NYU publicly affirm its commitment to respect all its workers, including student employees, by recognizing their right to form unions and to bargain collectively. That NYU publicly affirm that it will recognize workers’ unions through majority card verification.

6.) That NYU signs a contract guaranteeing fair labor practices for all NYU employees at home and abroad. This contract will extend to subcontracted workers, including bus drivers, food service employees and anyone involved in the construction, operation and maintenance at any of NYU’s non-U.S. sites.

7.) The establishment of a student elected Socially Responsible Finance Committee. This Committee will have full power to vote on proxies, draft shareholder resolutions, screen all university investments, establish new programs that encourage social and environmental responsibility and override all financial decisions the committee deems socially irresponsible, including investment decisions. The committee will be composed of two subcommittees: one to assess the operating budget and one to assess the endowment holdings. Each committee will be composed of ten students democratically elected from the graduate and under-graduate student bodies. All committee decisions will be made a strict majority vote, and will be upheld by the university. All members of the Socially Responsible Finance Committee will sit on the board of trustees, and will have equal voting rights. All Socially Responsible Finance Committee and Trustee meetings shall be open to the public, and their minutes made accessible electronically through NYU’s website. Elections will be held the second Tuesday of every March beginning March 10th 2009, and meetings will be held biweekly beginning the week of March 30th 2009.

8.) That the first two orders of business of the Socially Responsible Finance committee will be: a) An in depth investigation of all investments in war and genocide profiteers, as well as companies profiting from the occupation of Palestinian territories. b) A reassessment of the recently lifted of the ban on Coca Cola products.

9.)That annual scholarships be provided for thirteen Palestinian students, starting with the 2009/2010 academic year. These scholarships will include funding for books, housing, meals and travel expenses.

10.) That the university donate all excess supplies and materials in an effort to rebuild the University of Gaza.

11.) Tuition stabilization for all students, beginning with the class of 2012. All students will pay their initial tuition rate throughout the course of their education at New York University. Tuition rates for each successive year will not exceed the rate of inflation, nor shall they exceed one percent. The university shall meet 100% of government-calculated student financial need.

12.)That student groups have priority when reserving space in the buildings owned or leased by New York University, including, and especially, the Kimmel Center.

13.)That the general public have access to Bobst Library.

About the Author
Surekha Ratnatunga is a staff writer for NYU Local's National Section.
Top 10 Posts
tips@nyulocal.com

Post a Tip to NYU Local. Read the most recent posted tips here.

[tdomf_form6]

Should NYU Expand Its No Smoking Areas?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Buy viagra without prescription phentermine no prescription ambien no prescription xanax no prescription diazepam no prescription alprazolam no prescription valium no prescription clomid no prescription reductil no prescription meridia no prescription nexium no prescription zolpidem no prescription topamax no prescription tramadol no prescription ultram no prescription soma no prescription prednisone no prescription lipitor no prescription glucophage no prescription lorazepam no prescription buy discount viagra cheapest generic viagra viagra sale online buy generic cialis cheapest cialis no prescription purchase valtrex no prescription cheap nolvadex no prescription buy clomid no prescription purchase xenical no prescription zantac online no prescription order zithromax cheap cialis order viagra buy levitra online cheap lаsix Buy Viagra No Prescription Buy Orlistat Buy Alli Buy Xenical Buy viagra without prescription cialis without prescription viagra without prescription propecia without prescription levitra without prescription soma without prescription zithromax without prescription acomplia without prescription lasix without prescription accutane without prescription altace without prescription claritin without prescription zanaflex without prescription buy viagra order viagra cheap viagra buy cialis ! order cialis ! cheap cialis buy propecia order propecia cheap propecia buy levitra ! order levitra cheap levitra alprazolam online phentermine without prescription phentermine online klonopin without prescription klonopin online ativan without prescription ativan online meridia without prescription meridia online xenical without prescription xenical online tamiflu without prescription tamiflu online lipitor without prescription lipitor online diazepam without prescription diazepam online lexapro without prescription lexapro online alprazolam without prescription alprazolam online lorazepam without prescription lorazepam online clonazepam without prescription clonazepam online buy viagra order viagra cheap viagra buy levitra order levitra cheap levitra buy cialis order cialis cheap cialis buy propecia order propecia cheap propecia buy acomplia order acomplia cheap acomplia buy accutane order accutane cheap accutane buy xenical order xenical cheap xenical