<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Gawker Lost Its Edge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/</link>
	<description>The Blog of New York University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:03:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Fame Game &#171; Jess and Josh Talk About Stuff</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-11265</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fame Game &#171; Jess and Josh Talk About Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-11265</guid>
		<description>[...] Fame&#160;Game By jessroy  I guess Mike really wanted his own tag on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fame&nbsp;Game By jessroy  I guess Mike really wanted his own tag on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wurtzel Fails Test, Gawker Scoops Story &#124; NYU Local</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-3916</link>
		<dc:creator>Wurtzel Fails Test, Gawker Scoops Story &#124; NYU Local</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-3916</guid>
		<description>[...] a blatant attempt to appear scathing, intrusive and snarky, the infamous media blog made a post only intended to embarrass. A few commenters bit and voiced a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a blatant attempt to appear scathing, intrusive and snarky, the infamous media blog made a post only intended to embarrass. A few commenters bit and voiced a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Spees</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Spees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m making all my posts about media sites from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m making all my posts about media sites from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Feldman</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>Gee Mike, dude yr so famous/controversial! Maybe if Gawker exported its snarky distinctly New York brand of misanthropy to a historic Minnesotan locale like Northfield people would find its vitriol Midwestern, charming, and wholesome EVEN IF IT WAS COMPLETELY THE OPPOSITE!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Mike, dude yr so famous/controversial! Maybe if Gawker exported its snarky distinctly New York brand of misanthropy to a historic Minnesotan locale like Northfield people would find its vitriol Midwestern, charming, and wholesome EVEN IF IT WAS COMPLETELY THE OPPOSITE!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis Nefler</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis Nefler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Jessica Roy, Internet savant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessica Roy, Internet savant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Resnikoff</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Resnikoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>@ Mike: Of course mockery has a time and place. I think mockery is great! Just look at my own posts here. But mockery has to be earned, or else it&#039;s cheap and gratuitous. Who gives a shit whether or not Jimmy Kimmel was drunk in public once? These weird witch hunts Gawker occasionally goes on aren&#039;t just, as Nicole said, bad journalism, but they&#039;re also just generally shitty behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike: Of course mockery has a time and place. I think mockery is great! Just look at my own posts here. But mockery has to be earned, or else it&#8217;s cheap and gratuitous. Who gives a shit whether or not Jimmy Kimmel was drunk in public once? These weird witch hunts Gawker occasionally goes on aren&#8217;t just, as Nicole said, bad journalism, but they&#8217;re also just generally shitty behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole He</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole He</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>@ Mike: That&#039;s because you&#039;re kind of complimenting their journalistic integrity. Which is very frightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike: That&#8217;s because you&#8217;re kind of complimenting their journalistic integrity. Which is very frightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Vilensky</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Vilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>And in a totally fitting ending to this story, I&#039;m suddenly so relieved that Gawker is no longer snarky enough to actually say something totally mean about me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in a totally fitting ending to this story, I&#8217;m suddenly so relieved that Gawker is no longer snarky enough to actually say something totally mean about me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Roy</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>PS, your mission or not, something was accomplished:
http://gawker.com/5056326/raging-against-the-snark-machine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, your mission or not, something was accomplished:<br />
<a href="http://gawker.com/5056326/raging-against-the-snark-machine" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://gawker.com/5056326/raging-against-the-snark-machine');" rel="nofollow">http://gawker.com/5056326/raging-against-the-snark-machine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Vilensky</title>
		<link>http://nyulocal.com/entertainment/2008/09/29/how-gawker-lost-its-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Vilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyulocal.com/?p=1974#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>@ J.R.: Well, because they write for a high-profile website now, rather than a personal blog for insiders. 

I was just reommending the response piece if you felt you had something lengthy to say, but obvs I welcome comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ J.R.: Well, because they write for a high-profile website now, rather than a personal blog for insiders. </p>
<p>I was just reommending the response piece if you felt you had something lengthy to say, but obvs I welcome comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
